As he exits the scene soon, I think about Justice Souter's dissent in a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court case involving a group of roughly 60 probation officers and a violation of 1938 Federal Standand Labor Laws (FSLA) by the State of Maine. The officers, one whose last name was Alden, had been jipped of their overtime pay and both the state and federal courts turned their backs on them. Souter dissented in the U.S. Supreme Court case.
From Wikipedia: Alden v. Maine
From Cornell University: Syllabus in Alden v. Maine (98-436) 527 U.S. 706 (1999)
And here's a June 24, 1999 article by David Savage of the LA Times, Rulings Give States Broad Immunity Against Lawsuits, which mentions the decision and others regarding federalism and the sovereign rights of states.
However, most people will remember Souter as the justice who was part of the majority in Kelo v. City of New London, and whose home in Weare, New Hampshire Clarence Darrow Clements tried to take by eminent domain and turn it into the "Lost Liberty Hotel." The U.S. Supreme Court decision affirmed the Connecticut Supreme Court decision which allowed the taking of private property by eminent domain, for the benefit of a developer who promised to improve the neighborhood... people's homes were leveled.
So how is the redevelopment project going? It isn't. About Fort Trumbell from Tom Blumer:
I discovered around the year 2005 that the judicial system in the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is not as great as everyone seems to think it is. Or maybe it's the people who run it that suck! So I'm exposing the judges who it's clear did not have the best interest of justice in mind when they handed down their dirty decisions.
About Me
Current Events and Non-profit Websites
